<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Mitigation of cadmium toxicity stress by magnetopriming during  germination of soybean</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="author">
        <contrib contrib-type="person">
          <name>
            <surname>Vyas</surname>
            <given-names>Anjali</given-names>
          </name>
          <email>anjali14vyas12@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="person">
          <name>
            <surname>Kataria</surname>
            <given-names>Sunita</given-names>
          </name>
          <email>sunita_kataria@yahoo.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="person">
          <name>
            <surname>Prajapati</surname>
            <given-names>Rajkumar</given-names>
          </name>
          <email>rajkumar100rox@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-3"/>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="person">
          <name>
            <surname>Jain</surname>
            <given-names>Meeta</given-names>
          </name>
          <email>mjjainmeeta@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-4"/>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff-1">
        <institution>School of Biochemistry, Devi Ahilya Vishwavidyalya, Takshila Campus, Khandwa Road, Indore-452001 (M.P.), India</institution>
        <country>India</country>
      </aff>
      <aff id="aff-2">
        <institution>School of Biochemistry, Devi Ahilya Vishwavidyalya, Takshila Campus, Khandwa Road, Indore-452001 (M.P.), India</institution>
        <country>India</country>
      </aff>
      <aff id="aff-3">
        <institution>School of Biochemistry, Devi Ahilya Vishwavidyalya, Takshila Campus, Khandwa Road, Indore-452001 (M.P.), India</institution>
        <country>India</country>
      </aff>
      <aff id="aff-4">
        <institution>School of Biochemistry, Devi Ahilya Vishwavidyalya, Takshila Campus, Khandwa Road, Indore-452001 (M.P.), India</institution>
        <country>India</country>
      </aff>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2023-07-16">
          <day>16</day>
          <month>07</month>
          <year>2023</year>
        </date>
        <date data-type="published" iso-8601-date="2024-09-27">
          <day>27</day>
          <month>09</month>
          <year>2024</year>
        </date>
      </history>
    <pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>27</day><month>09</month><year>2024</year><volume>83</volume></pub-date></article-meta>
  </front>
  
  
<body id="body">
    <sec id="heading-0095eb97aaa44348a21a73cdadbaed6d">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="_paragraph-3">Abiotic stressors, which include temperature extremes, water availability, salinity, heavy metals, and UV radiation, can have detrimental effects on plants and result in significant crop yield losses (Saharan et al. 2022). Heavy metals such as arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury are toxic to plants and animals even at low concentrations and can accumulate in the environment from human activities such as mining, industrial discharge, and use of pesticides and fertilizers (Alengebawy et al. 2021, Singhal et al. 2023). ­Cadmium (Cd) is a nonessential, heavy metal element and a widespread environmental contaminant that is persistent, non-biodegradable, bio-accumulative and highly toxic even at low concentrations (Hussain et al. 2019, Mahawar and Shekhawat 2023). Cd toxicity, can affect many physiological and morphological processes in plants, including plant growth, respiration, water and nutrient uptake, and root growth (Chen et al. 2011, Liu et al. 2012, Sheirdil et al. 2012). Cd causes adverse effects on germination, seedling vigour index, and plant growth (Sheirdil et al. 2012, He et al. 2014). Plants exposed to Cd have damaged photosynthetic apparatus and inhibited chlorophyll biosynthesis, which negatively impacts growth and biomass, leaf chlorophyll fluorescence, and photosynthetic parameters. (Ci et al. 2010, Xue et al. 2014, Yang et al. 2015, Mahawar et al. 2021). Cd ­contamination in agricultural soils limits crop production, which is a major concern given the increasing demand for food worldwide. </p>
      <p id="_paragraph-4">Soybean (<italic id="_italic-1">Glycine max </italic>(L.) Merr.) is the most significant legume crop in the world, as 20% of the seed is oil and 40% is high-quality protein (Ferguson and Gresshoff 2009). It plays a significant role in the global oilseed agriculture landscape because of its high productivity, profitability, and ­essential role in preserving soil fertility. The increase in Cd concentration significantly inhibited seed germination, root and shoot growth in soybean plants (Sheirdil et al. 2012). Therefore, it is crucial to explore the approaches to alleviating heavy metal toxicity in soybean. Seed priming has proven to be an effective strategy for increasing seed vigour and germination, as well as seedling growth and field establishment in unfavourable conditions of heavy metal toxicity (Prajapati et al. 2020). It appears that seed priming is a helpful method for reducing cadmium toxicity in plants (­Singhal et al. 2023). In the field of seed technology, physical techniques have proven to be much superior to conventional protocols of osmo, chemical, hydro and hormonal priming (Bilalis et al. 2012). One of the most researched physical pre-sowing seed treatments in agriculture is based on the use of magnetic field (MF) for the alleviation of heavy metal ­toxicity (cadmium, arsenic and mercury) in plants (Chen et al. 2011, Fatima et al. 2020, Prajapati et al. 2023).</p>
      <p id="_paragraph-5">Magnetopriming (MP) has a significant effect on a number of processes, including morpho-structural elements (seed germination, plant growth, and yield) and modifications in the expression of genes linked to nitrogen metabolism and seed germination in non-stress and abiotic stress conditions (Kataria et al. 2020, Sarraf et al. 2020, Raipuria et al. 2021). According to some theories, MF could attract iron particles, growth hormones, and carbohydrates (Xue et al. 2014). It may also have an impact on transcription-related factors and gene expression processes (Stutte et al. 2006, Kataria et al. 2020). Additionally, it might immediately trigger the production of calcium ions (Ca<sup id="_superscript-1">2+</sup>) in seed embryos (Kataria et al. 2023). The germination of seeds and the physiological growth of tomato plants are significantly impacted by neodymium earth magnets by the stimulation of seed germination and speed of germination by 50% and production of larger leaf areas and more root hairs in the growing plantlets (Abhary and Akhkha 2023). It was earlier reported that MP mitigates the adverse effect of cadmium stress in mung beans by reducing the level of malondialdehyde, nitric ­oxide, hydrogen peroxide and superoxide radical content and increased the growth and photosynthetic performance in mung bean plants (Chen et al. 2011). However, the mitigating effect of MP during seed germination has not been reported for heavy metal toxicity especially for cadmium in soybean seedlings. Hence the objective of the present study is to examine the impact of MP on seed germination, seedling growth and biochemical parameters in soybean under cadmium toxicity and to reveal if MP could enhance tolerance of soybean towards Cd toxicity during early seedling stage.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="heading-dd05ac9b7395285706efcbd5c806202e">
      <title>Materials and methods</title>
      <sec id="heading-7d3f39de795a819c54c09b792611958f">
        <title>Plant material</title>
        <p id="_paragraph-8">Breeder seeds of soybean (<italic id="_italic-2">Glycine max</italic> [L.]) var. JS-9560 (commonly grown variety of soybean in the Malwa region, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India), were obtained from the ICAR-Indian Institute of Soybean Research, Khandwa Road, Indore, M.P., India.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="heading-5b4c52f0e600b7639b4afc21a5c869e9">
        <title>Magnetic field treatment</title>
        <p id="_paragraph-10">To pre-treat the seeds with a static magnetic field (SMF), we used an electromagnet (AETec), fabricated by the ­Academy of Embedded Technology in Delhi, India. The pole components measured 16 cm in length and 9 cm in diameter while the coil consisted of 3000 turns and a resistance of 16 Ohms. Nearly 100 dry seeds of soybean at a time were placed in a cylindrical sample holder made of thin transparent ­plastic between the two poles of the electromagnet for magnetopriming, while maintaining the temperature at 25 ± 1 °C. The distance between the two poles was 5 cm. The SMF was developed using a direct current (DC) power supply (80 V/10 A) with a continuously changing output. Based on previous studies, soybean seeds were treated with 200 mT of SMF for an hour (Kataria et al. 2020). The SMF strength was obtained by adjusting the current and voltage by power ­supply and the obtained SMF strength was measured using a digital gauss meter (AETech model DGM-102) with a probe consisting of an indium arsenide crystal encapsulated by a 5×4×1 mm non-magnetic sheet. The local geomagnetic field was less than 10 mT in the north to south direction. With the exception of the SMF treatment (200 mT for 1 hour) for primed seeds, all other conditions were the same for unprimed and magnetoprimed seeds. Every experiment was carried out concurrently with unprimed seeds (which were used as controls) stored at room temperature (25 ± 1 °C) and kept away from the magnetic field (less than 5 mT).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="heading-81385a1cf6effdc7349731b662420fbc">
        <title>Treatment to induce cadmium toxicity</title>
        <p id="_paragraph-12">To conduct the germination experiment, both magnetoprimed and unprimed soybean seeds were first surface- -sterilized with 0.01% HgCl<sub id="_subscript-1">2</sub> for 2 minutes, followed by washing three times with distilled water. The fifteen seeds were then allowed to germinate on wet Whatman filter ­paper in each Petri plate (15 cm diameter) in three replications with 10 mL of different concentrations of CdCl<sub id="_subscript-2">2</sub> (25, 50, 100, 200, and 300 μM) while 10 mL of distilled water was used as a control (0 μM). The seeds were kept for germination in darkness at 25 ± 1 °C for 5 days in the incubator. Germination percentage was calculated based on the ­number of normal seedlings, as the ratio of the number of germinated seeds to the total number of seeds on the third day of imbibition in different concentrations of CdCl<sub id="_subscript-3">2</sub>.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="heading-0c3cb7c32fcd67055dbb70c88b314cfc">
        <title>Early growth characteristics of seedlings</title>
        <p id="_paragraph-14">To estimate the effect of magnetopriming on soybean seedling growth, ten seedlings were randomly selected from each treatment (magnetoprimed and unprimed seeds germinated under different concentrations of CdCl<sub id="_subscript-4">2</sub>) in biological triplicates (N = 3). The length of shoot and root, along with the length of the whole seedling, were measured for each selected seedling. Fresh weight was also measured. For dry weight determination, the seedlings were dried in an oven at 80 °C for 72 h and weighed. The vigour index was calculated using the formulae proposed by Abdul-Baki and Anderson (1973): </p>
        <p id="_paragraph-15">Vigour index I = germination % × seedling length (root + shoot) cm</p>
        <p id="_paragraph-16">Vigour index II = germination % × seedling dry weight (root + shoot) g</p>
        <p id="_paragraph-17">Vigour index I is the multiple of the percentage of germination and seedling length, and Vigour index II is the multiple of percentage of germination and seedling dry weight.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="heading-62f9b48fd0221b3e68e13915dbd02e81">
        <title>Enzyme activities during germination</title>
        <p id="_paragraph-19">Total amylase and protease activities were measured in the soybean seedlings derived from unprimed and magnetoprimed seeds after 5 days (120 h) of imbibition under different CdCl<sub id="_subscript-5">2 </sub>concentrations. After 5 days of imbibition, the fresh seedlings with root, shoot and cotyledons were taken for analysis of enzymes and biochemical parameters. Each experiment was repeated in three biological replicates with three technical replicates.</p>
        <p id="_paragraph-20">The assay of total amylase activity was performed using the method of Sawhney et al. (1970). The seedling homogenate (100 mg) was mixed with 5 mL of 80% chilled acetone and centrifuged at 15000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. The resulting pellet was dissolved in 10 mL of 0.2 M phosphate buffer (pH 6.4) and centrifuged again at 15000 rpm for 20 min at 4 °C. The amylase activity in the obtained supernatant was then determined by the addition of 2 mL of ­phosphate buffer (pH 6.4), 1 mL of starch (1%), and incubation for 30 min at room temperature. Subsequently, 1 mL of 0.1 M HCl and 0.1 mL of 0.1 M potassium iodide were ­added to the reaction mixture and the absorbance was measured at 660 nm using a spectrophotometer. The total amylase ­activity was expressed as mg starch hydrolysed g<sup id="_superscript-2">-1</sup> fresh weight of seedlings h<sup id="_superscript-3">-1</sup>.</p>
        <p id="_paragraph-21">The assay of protease activity was carried out according the method of Kunitz (1947) modified by Kataria et al. (2023). The 1.0 g seedlings were crushed in 0.2 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and centrifuged at 13800 rpm at 4 °C for 30 min. To 0.5 mL of supernatant, 0.5 mL of casein (1%) prepared in 0.2 M carbonate buffer (pH 9.2) was added and the mixture was incubated for 10 min at 37 °C. The ­reaction was terminated by the addition of 1 mL of 10% ­trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and centrifugation at 13800 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. After centrifugation, 2.5 mL of carbonate buffer (0.44 M, pH 9.5) was added and the development of a blue colour was observed upon addition of 0.5 mL Folin’s reagent followed by incubation for 30 min at room temperature. The protein content was measured at 660 nm against carbonate buffer (0.44 M, pH 9.5) and Folin’s reagent taken as a blank and the protease activity was represented as mg protein ­hydrolysed g<sup id="_superscript-4">-1</sup> fresh weight of seedlings.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="heading-aa9c058f53661dfd49549cfe5388ea4f">
        <title>Determination of biochemical parameters</title>
        <p id="_paragraph-23">Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) were used to measure the level of malondialdehyde (MDA), ­according to the method described by Heath and Packer (1968). Soybean seedlings (100 mg) were homogenized in 1 mL of 0.1% (w/v) TCA, and the resulting homogenate was centrifuged at 12000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C. The ­supernatant was used for the TBARS assay. Specifically, 0.5 mL of the supernatant was mixed with 1 mL of 0.5% (w/v) 2-thiobarbituric acid (TBA) prepared in 20% TCA and incubated in a boiling water bath for 30 min. The reaction was stopped by placing the tube in an ice bath, and the mixture was then centrifuged at 12000 rpm for 5 min. The absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 532 nm, and the value for the non-specific absorbance read at 600 nm was subtracted. TBA (0.5%) in TCA (20%) was taken as blank. The amount of MDA was calculated using an extinction coefficient (e = 155 mM<sup id="_superscript-5">–1</sup> cm<sup id="_superscript-6">–1</sup>) and expressed as µmol MDA mg<sup id="_superscript-7">–1</sup> fresh weight of seedlings.</p>
        <p id="_paragraph-24">The proline content was calculated using the method of Bates et al. (1973). Using a mortar and pestle, 500 mg of ­soybean seedlings were homogenised in 10 mL of 3% (w/v) aqueous sulphosalicylic acid; the homogenate was then ­centrifuged for 5 min at 4 °C at 10000 rpm. The proline was estimated using the supernatant. Two mL each of glacial ­acetic acid, acid ninhydrin reagent, and supernatant were combined. The mixture was boiled at 100 °C for 1 h. The ­reaction was terminated by cooling in an ice bath and 4 mL of toluene was added. Following thorough mixing, the ­toluene-containing chromophore was isolated, and the red colour generated absorbance was measured at 520 nm using toluene as the blank. The proline content was calculated through the standard curve prepared in the range of 5–25 μg proline and expressed as μg proline g<sup id="_superscript-8">-1</sup> fresh weight of the seedlings.</p>
        <p id="_paragraph-25">The estimation of hydrogen peroxide (H<sub id="_subscript-6">2</sub>O<sub id="_subscript-7">2</sub>) was carried out by the method described by Mukherjee and Choudhuri (1983), which involves the formation of a titanium-hydroperoxide complex. First, 0.5 g of soybean seedlings were crushed in chilled acetone (5 mL) and filtered using ­Whatman No.1 filter paper. The filtrate (5 mL) was mixed with titanium reagent (2 mL; containing 5% (w/v) titanium oxide and potassium sulphate digested in concentrated ­sulphuric acid) and ammonium hydroxide solution (2.5 mL) to precipitate the titanium-hydroperoxide complex. The ­resulting precipitate was centrifuged at 13800 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C, and the pellet was resuspended in concentrated sulphuric acid (2 M) and centrifuged again. The ­absorbance of the supernatant was then measured at 415 nm against sulphuric acid (2 M) using a Shimadzu Spectro­photometer (UV-1800) and the amount of H<sub id="_subscript-8">2</sub>O<sub id="_subscript-9">2 </sub>was calculated and expressed as μmol g<sup id="_superscript-9">-1</sup> fresh weight.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="heading-0246fd480b2fd594af05d577519165eb">
        <title>Tolerance index (TI)</title>
        <p id="_paragraph-27">Tolerance index (in terms of root length) of seedlings from unprimed and magnetoprimed seeds grown under different concentrations of CdCl<sub id="_subscript-10">2 </sub>was determined with the following formula given by Iqbal and Rahmati (1992): </p>
        <p id="_paragraph-28">Tolerance index (T.I.) =<bold id="_bold-1"> </bold>mean root length in metal solution / mean root length in control × 100</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="heading-820242b7a18a2a4d338cbee123f94263">
        <title>Statistical analysis</title>
        <p id="_paragraph-30">Three replications and fully randomised designs were used to arrange the samples. The mean ± standard error (S.E.) of the three biological replicates (N = 3) was used to show the data. Ten seedlings were taken for each replication in order to measure the many aspects of seedling growth, including length of seedlings, root and shoot, fresh and dry weight of seedling, and vigour indices. The mean of three seedlings in each replica serves as the data for the bio­chemical analysis. The data were analysed by Student’s t-test and significant differences between non-stressed and ­Cd-stressed soybean seedlings that emerged from unprimed seeds are marked as following <sup id="_superscript-10">*</sup>P &lt; 0.05, <sup id="_superscript-11">**</sup>P &lt; 0.01, <sup id="_superscript-12">***</sup>P &lt; 0.001. Statistically significant differences between magnetoprimed and unprimed seedlings grown in non-stress as well as ­Cd-stress conditions are marked as <sup id="_superscript-13">#</sup>P &lt; 0.05, <sup id="_superscript-14">##</sup>P &lt; 0.01, <sup id="_superscript-15">###</sup>P &lt; 0.001. </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="heading-0bc5717a30aa8d5ff967b826b2329793">
      <title>Results</title>
      <sec id="heading-a217b92b906ba37bd08607e505296869">
        <title>Effect of MP on seed germination and seedling development under cadmium treatments</title>
        <p id="_paragraph-33">Germination percentage decreased with increasing ­CdCl<sub id="_subscript-11">2 </sub>concentration in magnetoprimed and unprimed seeds of soybean. A remarkable decrease of 50% was ­observed at 100 μM CdCl<sub id="_subscript-12">2 </sub>and 72% was observed at 200 and 300 μM CdCl<sub id="_subscript-13">2</sub> in unprimed seeds (Fig. 1a). Magnetopriming of seeds enhanced percentage germination at all the ­concentrations of CdCl<sub id="_subscript-14">2</sub> used as compared to respective unprimed seeds. Maximum enhancement in percentage germination by MP (41%, 66% and 33%) was obtained at 100, 200 and 300 μM CdCl<sub id="_subscript-15">2,</sub> respectively (Fig. 1a).</p>
        <p id="_paragraph-34">Root, shoot and seedling lengths were reduced with increasing CdCl<sub id="_subscript-16">2 </sub>concentration in magnetoprimed and unprimed seeds of soybean (Fig. 1b-1d). The decrease in root length was more prominent than the decrease in shoot length. Maximum decreases of 75% and 93% were observed in root length of seedlings from unprimed seeds at 100 and 200 μM CdCl<sub id="_subscript-17">2</sub> and root growth was completely inhibited at 300 μΜ CdCl<sub id="_subscript-18">2 </sub>(Fig. 1b). Magnetoprimed soybean seeds demonstrated higher shoot and root length at all the concentrations of CdCl<sub id="_subscript-19">2</sub> used as compared to corresponding controls (Fig. 1b, 1c). Magnetopriming caused increases of 18, 19 and 24% in shoot length of seedlings at 50, 100 and 200 μM CdCl<sub id="_subscript-20">2, </sub>respectively (Fig. 1b). Similarly, significant promotion in root length by 55, 113 and 240% at 50, 100 and 200 μM CdCl<sub id="_subscript-21">2</sub> respectively was obtained in seedlings from magnetoprimed seeds as compared to the seedlings of unprimed seeds (Fig. 1c).</p>
        <p id="_paragraph-35">There was substantial decrease in length of seedlings observed at a higher concentration (300 μΜ) of CdCl<sub id="_subscript-22">2 </sub>(Fig. 1d). The CdCl<sub id="_subscript-23">2</sub> at 100, 200 and 300 μΜ concentrations caused significant inhibition of seedling length by 51%, 73% and 80% respectively. On the other hand, a maximum increase of 31% was observed at 100 μM CdCl<sub id="_subscript-24">2 </sub>followed by a 59% increase at 200 μM CdCl<sub id="_subscript-25">2</sub> in magnetoprimed seeds (Fig. 1d).</p>
        <fig id="fig1">
          <label>Figure 1</label>
          <caption>
            <p id="_paragraph-36"/>
          </caption>
          <graphic id="_graphic-1" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="jpeg" xlink:href="image1.jpg"/>
        </fig>
        <p id="_paragraph-37">
          <bold id="_bold-2">Fig. 1. Effect of magnetopriming on percentage germination (a), shoot length (b), root length (c) and seedling length (d) of soybean seedlings under Cd toxicity. The vertical lines on the bar indicate ± S.E. for mean of triplicates (n = 3). Significant differences between non-stressed and Cd-stressed soybean seedlings that emerged from unprimed seeds are marked as follows: <sup id="_superscript-16">*</sup>P &lt; 0.05, <sup id="_superscript-17">**</sup>P &lt; 0.01, <sup id="_superscript-18">***</sup>P &lt; 0.001. Statistically significant differences between magnetoprimed (MP) and unprimed (UP) seedlings grown in non-stress as well as Cd-stress conditions are marked as <sup id="_superscript-19">#</sup>P &lt; 0.05, <sup id="_superscript-20">##</sup>P &lt; 0.01; <sup id="_superscript-21">###</sup>P &lt; 0.001.</bold>
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="heading-7b416b406f05503315d1e2ecf4e35420">
        <title>Effect of MP on fresh weight and dry weight of soybean seedling under cadmium treatments</title>
        <p id="_paragraph-39">Fresh and dry weight of unprimed and primed seeds gradually decreased with increasing CdCl<sub id="_subscript-26">2</sub> concentration (Fig. 2a, 2b). CdCl<sub id="_subscript-27">2 </sub>treatments caused reduction in fresh weight by 26%, 35% and 44% respectively at 100, 200 and 300 μΜ CdCl<sub id="_subscript-28">2</sub> concentration as compared to the controls (Fig. 2a). Further, there was significant increase in fresh and dry weight of seedling observed in primed seeds as compared to unprimed ones at all the concentrations of Cd used. Maximum of 24, 37, 42 and 21% promotion in fresh weight of seedlings was found in magnetoprimed as compared to unprimed seed respectively at 50, 100, 200 and 300 μΜ ­CdCl<sub id="_subscript-29">2 </sub>(Fig. 2a). Similar results were observed for dry weight of seedlings (Fig. 2b).</p>
        <fig id="fig2">
          <label>Figure 2</label>
          <caption>
            <p id="_paragraph-40"/>
          </caption>
          <graphic id="_graphic-2" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="jpeg" xlink:href="image2.jpg"/>
        </fig>
        <p id="_paragraph-41">
          <bold id="_bold-3">Fig. 2. Effect of magnetopriming on fresh weight (a) and dry weight (b) of soybean seedlings under Cd toxicity. The vertical lines on the bar indicate ± S.E. for mean of triplicates (n = 3). Significant differences between non-stressed and Cd-stressed soybean seedlings that emerged from unprimed seeds are marked as follows: <sup id="_superscript-22">*</sup>P &lt; 0.05, <sup id="_superscript-23">**</sup>P &lt; 0.01. Statistically significant differences between magnetoprimed (MP) and unprimed (UP) seedlings grown in non-stress as well as Cd-stress conditions are marked as <sup id="_superscript-24">##</sup>P &lt; 0.01.</bold>
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="heading-4b4cc905407bac3ce2949b59c8c7ecb9">
        <title>Effect of MP on vigour indices of soybean seedling under cadmium treatments</title>
        <p id="_paragraph-43">Treatment of soybean seeds with different concentrations of CdCl<sub id="_subscript-30">2 </sub>reduced the seed vigour indices gradually from 0 to 100 μΜ CdCl<sub id="_subscript-31">2, </sub>thereafter significant decrease was observed at 200 and 300 μΜ in both primed and unprimed seeds (Fig. 3a, 3b). Vigour index-I was found decreased prominently by 75%, 92% and 94% respectively at 100, 200 and 300 μΜ CdCl<sub id="_subscript-32">2</sub> concentration in unprimed seeds compared to their controls (Fig. 3a). Similarly, vigour index-II decreased severely at 200 and 300 μΜ CdCl<sub id="_subscript-33">2</sub> concentrations by 83% and 87% respectively in seeds compared to the ­control (Fig. 3b). However, magnetoprimed seeds showed higher vigour indices at all CdCl<sub id="_subscript-34">2 </sub>levels as compared to unprimed seeds. There was prominent increase in vigour index-I at 50, 100 and 200 μΜ CdCl<sub id="_subscript-35">2</sub> concentration (84%, 165% and 43% respectively) in magnetoprimed seeds as compared to unprimed seeds (Fig. 3a). Similarly, vigour ­index-II increased significantly at 100, 200 and 300 μΜ ­CdCl<sub id="_subscript-36">2 </sub>concentration by 106, 147 and 135% respectively in magnetoprimed seeds as compared to unprimed seeds (Fig. 3b).</p>
        <fig id="fig3">
          <label>Figure 3</label>
          <caption>
            <p id="_paragraph-44"/>
          </caption>
          <graphic id="_graphic-3" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="jpeg" xlink:href="image3.jpg"/>
        </fig>
        <p id="_paragraph-45">
          <bold id="_bold-4">Fig. 3. Effect of magnetopriming on vigour index-I (a) and vigour index-II (b) of soybean seedlings under Cd toxicity. The vertical lines on the bar indicate ± S.E. for mean of triplicates (n = 3). Significant differences between non-stressed and Cd-stressed soybean seedlings that emerged from unprimed seeds are marked as follows: <sup id="_superscript-25">**</sup>P &lt; 0.01, <sup id="_superscript-26">***</sup>P &lt; 0.001. Statistically significant differences between magnetoprimed (MP) and unprimed (UP) seedlings grown in non-stress as well as Cd-stress conditions are marked as <sup id="_superscript-27">##</sup>P &lt; 0.01, <sup id="_superscript-28">###</sup>P &lt; 0.001.</bold>
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="heading-03e446a10429d783061c6a886a6335bb">
        <title>Effect of MP on total amylase and protease activities in soybean seedlings under cadmium treatments</title>
        <p id="_paragraph-47">When soybean seeds were stressed with CdCl<sub id="_subscript-37">2</sub>, total amylase and protease activities decreased slightly in the seedlings from unprimed seeds as compared to control seedlings. However, primed seeds showed increased amylase activity by 49%, 51%, 64% and 70% at 0, 100, 200 and 300 μM CdCl<sub id="_subscript-38">2 </sub>concentrations, respectively (Fig. 4a). Further, ­magnetoprimed seeds showed increased protease activity by 30, 44, 54 and 53% at 0, 100, 200 and 300 μM CdCl<sub id="_subscript-39">2 ­</sub>concentrations, respectively (Fig. 4b).</p>
        <fig id="fig4">
          <label>Figure 4</label>
          <caption>
            <p id="_paragraph-48"/>
          </caption>
          <graphic id="_graphic-4" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="jpeg" xlink:href="image4.jpg"/>
        </fig>
        <p id="_paragraph-49">
          <bold id="_bold-5">Fig. 4. Effect of magnetopriming on amount of starch hydrolysed (a) and protein hydrolysed (b) in soybean seedlings under Cd toxicity. The vertical lines on the bar indicate ± S.E. for mean of triplicates (n = 3). Significant differences between non-stressed and Cd-stressed soybean seedlings that emerged from unprimed seeds are marked as follows: <sup id="_superscript-29">*</sup>P &lt; 0.05, <sup id="_superscript-30">**</sup>P &lt; 0.01. Statistically significant differences between magnetoprimed (MP) and unprimed (UP) seedlings grown in non-stress as well as Cd-stress conditions are marked as <sup id="_superscript-31">##</sup>P &lt; 0.001. FW – fresh weigh.</bold>
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="heading-ab6e1e4c27166c04879ab90fbebd4929">
        <title>Effect of MP on proline, MDA and H<sub id="_subscript-40">2</sub>O<sub id="_subscript-41">2</sub> content in soybean seedlings under cadmium treatments</title>
        <p id="_paragraph-51">MDA content was found to rise gradually with increasing concentration of CdCl<sub id="_subscript-42">2</sub> in unprimed as well as primed seedlings. However, the level of MDA was higher in seedlings emerged from unprimed seeds at all the concentrations of CdCl<sub id="_subscript-43">2</sub> used (Fig. 5a). MDA content was decreased in the seedlings from SMF-primed seeds as compared to the seedlings from unprimed seeds at all the concentrations of CdCl<sub id="_subscript-44">2</sub> (0 to 300 μM) (Fig. 5a). A remarkable decrease in MDA content (by 37%) was observed at 300 μM CdCl<sub id="_subscript-45">2 </sub>concentration in the seedlings from primed seeds as compared to the seedlings of unprimed seeds. </p>
        <p id="_paragraph-52">Proline content was considerably increased in seedlings of unprimed seeds at all the concentrations of CdCl<sub id="_subscript-46">2 </sub>(Fig. 5b). The enhancement in proline content was 39, 92 and 100% in seedlings of unprimed seeds at 100, 200 and 300 μM CdCl<sub id="_subscript-47">2</sub> concentrations as compared to the control seedlings. Magnetopriming of seeds lowered the proline quantity at all concentrations of CdCl<sub id="_subscript-48">2</sub>. There was 23% decrease in proline content at 200 μM and 300 μM CdCl<sub id="_subscript-49">2</sub> concentration in primed seeds (Fig. 5b).</p>
        <p id="_paragraph-53">The cadmium treatments increased the H<sub id="_subscript-50">2</sub>O<sub id="_subscript-51">2</sub> content by 26% (200 μM CdCl<sub id="_subscript-52">2</sub>) and 35% (300 μM CdCl<sub id="_subscript-53">2</sub>) in the seedlings of unprimed seeds as compared to their controls (Fig. 5c). Magnetopriming also caused a further increase in H<sub id="_subscript-54">2</sub>O<sub id="_subscript-55">2</sub> content in soybean seedlings in comparison to un­primed seeds at all the cadmium chloride concentrations.</p>
        <fig id="fig5">
          <label>Figure 5</label>
          <caption>
            <p id="_paragraph-54"/>
          </caption>
          <graphic id="_graphic-5" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="jpeg" xlink:href="image5.jpg"/>
        </fig>
        <p id="_paragraph-55">
          <bold id="_bold-6">Fig. 5. Effect of magnetopriming on malondialdehyde - MDA (a), proline (b) and H<sub id="_subscript-56">2</sub>O<sub id="_subscript-57">2 </sub>(c)content of soybean seedlings under Cd toxicity. The vertical lines on the bar indicate ± SE for mean of triplicates (n = 3). Significant differences between non-stressed and Cd-stressed soybean seedlings that emerged from unprimed seeds are marked as follows: <sup id="_superscript-32">*</sup>P &lt; 0.05, <sup id="_superscript-33">**</sup>P &lt; 0.01, <sup id="_superscript-34">***</sup>P &lt; 0.001. Statistically significant differences between magnetoprimed (MP) and unprimed (UP) seedlings grown in non-stress as well as Cd-stress conditions are marked as <sup id="_superscript-35">#</sup>P &lt; 0.05, <sup id="_superscript-36">##</sup>P &lt; 0.01. FW – fresh weight.</bold>
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="heading-172395a71676625ac04f516461b4060c">
        <title>Effect of MP on tolerance index (TI) of soybean seedlings under cadmium treatments</title>
        <p id="_paragraph-57">TI was 100% for control seedlings and it decreased with an increase in CdCl<sub id="_subscript-58">2</sub> toxicity (Fig. 6). The TI after treatment with 25, 50, 100, 200 and 300 μM CdCl<sub id="_subscript-59">2</sub> was 78, 45, 25, 8 and 0%, respectively, for soybean seedlings obtained from unprimed seeds (Fig. 6). Whereas seeds pre-treated with MP showed higher values of TI at all the levels of CdCl<sub id="_subscript-60">2</sub> i.e. 87, 61, 46, 22 and 2% TI compared to values from unprimed seeds at 25, 50, 100, 200 and 300 μM CdCl<sub id="_subscript-61">2</sub>, respectively.</p>
        <fig id="fig6">
          <label>Figure 6</label>
          <caption>
            <p id="_paragraph-58"/>
          </caption>
          <graphic id="_graphic-6" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="jpeg" xlink:href="image6.jpg"/>
        </fig>
        <p id="_paragraph-59">
          <bold id="_bold-7">Fig. 6. Effect of magnetopriming on tolerance index of soybean seedlings in terms of root length under Cd toxicity. The vertical lines on the bar indicate ± SE for mean of triplicates (n = 3). Significant differences between non-stressed and Cd-stressed soybean seedlings that emerged from unprimed seeds are marked as follows: <sup id="_superscript-37">*</sup>P &lt; 0.05, <sup id="_superscript-38">**</sup>P &lt; 0.01, <sup id="_superscript-39">***</sup>P &lt; 0.001. Statistically significant differences between magnetoprimed (MP) and unprimed (UP) seedlings grown in non-stress as well as Cd-stress conditions are marked as <sup id="_superscript-40">#</sup>P &lt; 0.05, <sup id="_superscript-41">##</sup>P &lt; 0.01, <sup id="_superscript-42">###</sup>P &lt; 0.001. </bold>
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="heading-ff7f3b7e9180d1a8f51b78dcda3118a3">
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="_paragraph-61">Amongst heavy metals, Cd is a toxic environmental contaminant, which has detrimental effect on plants, animals and humans. It is often found in industrial and agricultural waste and can contaminate soil, water, and food (Yin et al. 2021). The germinating seed serves as the first point of interaction between the developing plant and its surrounding environment, making it particularly susceptible to the toxic effects of Cd (Stefanello 2019, Mahawar et al. 2021). Cd significantly inhibited the seed germination of various plant species such as swiss chard, lettuce, wheat, basil, chia, beans and spinach (Ahmad et al. 2012, Bautista et al. 2013, El Rasafi et al. 2016, Gharebaghi et al. 2017, Stefanello 2019).</p>
      <p id="_paragraph-62">The results of the present investigation also showed that, in seedlings derived from unprimed seeds, Cd treatments significantly inhibit seed germination and early seedling growth parameters (root, shoot, and seedling length, fresh and dry weight of seedlings, and vigour indices); a dose-response inhibition was noted for every parameter examined. Even in the presence of cadmium, however, MP of soybean seeds with SMF at 200 mT for an hour before germination ­improved the seeds' early development characteristics. The length of both shoot and root is critical for efficient material exchange and nutrient acquisition (Bewley and Black 1994, Stefanello 2019). The inhibition was more pronounced for root length in the seedlings from unprimed seeds grown ­under Cd treatments. At a higher concentration of Cd (300 mM CdCl<sub id="_subscript-62">2</sub>), the root growth was completely inhibited. Interestingly, MP with SMF enhanced root length to a greater extent than the shoot length. In the present study, positive effects of MP were observed in soybean seedlings under Cd toxicity, such as increased seed germination percentage, root, shoot, and seedling length, as well as enhanced fresh/dry weight and vigour indices of seedlings. The inhibitory effects of Cd on shoot and root growth lead to stunted seedlings as Cd toxicity disrupts the water and nutrient uptake and transport (Liu et al. 2012, Sheirdil et al. 2012, Stefanello 2019). The increase in root length induced by MP can contribute to ­enhanced water and nutrient uptake and provide necessary resources for seedlings to cope with the toxic effects of Cd. However, the exposure of seeds to MF has earlier been shown to increase their capacity to absorb moisture and their nutrient content in soybean (Kavi 1977, Radhakrishnan and ­Kumari 2012). These effects on moisture absorption and physiological activity can contribute to improved germination and seedling vigour. There have also been reports on the effects of very low-frequency alternating magnetic fields on cell membrane ionic permeability (Khizhenkov et al. 2001, Thomas et al. 2013). Studies by Kataria et al. (2019, 2020, 2021, 2023) have confirmed that applying MP with SMF-pretreatment to the seeds can have a positive effect on seed germination and seedling vigour under salt stress. Our ­results are consistent with the findings of several earlier ­studies, including those on rice, wheat, maize, soybean and barley seeds, which have also revealed that MP can improve seed germination percentage, seedling growth and vigour index (Carbonell et al. 2000, Florez et al. 2007, Martinez et al. 2009, Shine et al. 2012, Kataria et al. 2015, Ercan et al. 2022). The tolerance index represents the ability of seedlings to withstand and survive under CdCl<sub id="_subscript-63">2</sub> toxicity, decreased with increasing concentrations of CdCl<sub id="_subscript-64">2</sub> in both unprimed and magnetoprimed seedlings. However, the seedlings from magnetoprimed seeds exhibited a higher tolerance index than unprimed seed at all the concentrations of Cd. This suggests that MP helped to mitigate the inhibitory effects of cadmium on seedling growth and increased their tolerance to Cd toxicity. Similarly, Kataria et al. (2020, 2022) have reported that the salt tolerance index of soybean seedlings was increased by MP due to the higher nitric oxide production by SMF pre-treatment, which helps to maintain the balance of abscisic acid (ABA) and gibberellic acid (GA) for higher seed germination and seedling growth under salt stress ­conditions.</p>
      <p id="_paragraph-63">Furthermore, high concentrations of Cd have negative effects on hydrolyzing enzymes including acid phosphatases (ACPs) and α-amylases, they prevent reserved carbohydrates from being hydrolyzed and from moving from the endosperm to the growing embryonic axis. As a result, the embryo that is germinating becomes starved (Kuriakose and Prasad, 2008). Amylase is an enzyme that breaks down the stored carbohydrate reserves of a seed during germination. Also, it has been shown that Cd's interactions with proteolytic enzymes limit store protein catabolism, which results in the slowing of seedling growth (Gianazza et al., 2007). The magnetoprimed soybean seeds maintained a higher total amylase and protease activity than unprimed seeds under both non-stress and in cadmium stressed conditions. This suggests that the MP may have influenced the biochemical mechanisms involved in seed germination and growth, including amylase and protease activity. Our finding is consistent with the results of previous studies. For ­instance, Vashisth and Nagarajan (2010) reported that magnetoprimed wheat and sunflower seeds had significantly higher amylase activity than their controls. Previous studies have reported higher α-amylase and protease activity in magnetoprimed soybean and maize seedlings under various stress conditions such as salt, mercury toxicity and UV-B (Kataria et al. 2017, 2019, 2020, 2023, Raipuria et al. 2021, Prajapati et al. 2023). The higher protease activity in magnetoprimed seeds could contribute to the breakdown of stored proteins into amino acids (Rajendra et al. 2005) that can be utilized for energy and growth during seedling ­development. The results suggest that MP can enhance the seedling's ability to cope with stress conditions by increasing total amylase and protease activities, which might ­improve the crop tolerance under Cd toxicity. Theoretical studies have shown that a magnetic field may enhance the density of ions passing through the cellular membrane of a seed, so affecting the osmotic pressure in a way that favours water entering into the cell (Reina et al. 2001). As previously indicated, seeds exposed to either a static or an oscillating magnetic field had higher levels of enzyme activity, particularly α-amylase (Kataria et al. 2017, 2020). The enzymes α-amylase which help the seed use its stored starch energy, are essential for seed germination. Therefore, a larger amount of solvent would be supplied to the seed's germination enzymes more quickly by the magnetic field's osmotic pressure action (Diehl 2022). </p>
      <p id="_paragraph-64">Interestingly, MP was found to lower the levels of MDA and oxidative stress marker (proline) and enhanced the H<sub id="_subscript-65">2</sub>O<sub id="_subscript-66">2 </sub>content in soybean seedlings in the presence of Cd toxicity. This suggests that MP may play a protective role against oxidative damage caused by CdCl<sub id="_subscript-67">2</sub> stress in plants. Similar findings were reported by Chen et al. (2011), where MF treatment was found to reduce the toxic effects of Cd on mung bean by increasing the rate of photosynthesis, nitric oxide concentration, and nitric oxide synthase activity, and reducing the lipid peroxidation. Chen et al. (2017) found the alleviation of the adverse effect of Cd and lead (Pb) through MP due to enhanced lipid peroxidation and antioxidant defence system in wheat seedlings. According to Prajapati et al. (2023), MP reduced lipid peroxidation at 200 mT (1 h) while increased the H<sub id="_subscript-68">2</sub>O<sub id="_subscript-69">2 </sub>content in soybean seedlings grown under mercury toxicity. This implies that MP alters membrane stability and H<sub id="_subscript-70">2</sub>O<sub id="_subscript-71">2</sub> content to regulate antioxidant activity. Fatima et al. (2020) also observed that MP of soybean seeds mitigated the arsenic toxicity in terms of growth, photosynthesis, and water uptake through increase in the thickness of the midrib of leaves. </p>
      <p id="_paragraph-65">Several studies have reported changes in proline content in plants under different stress conditions and magnetic treatments. Banerjee and Roychoudhury (2015) stated that proline serves as an osmoprotectant in plants cultivated in a range of stressful conditions. For instance, cadmium toxicity caused a significant increase in proline accumulation in the shoots of <italic id="_italic-3">Brassica juncea, Triticum aestivum,</italic> and <italic id="_italic-4">Vigna ra</italic><italic id="_italic-5">diata, </italic>indicating that proline plays an important role in the response to cadmium stress (Alia and Saradhi 1991, Sharmila et al. 2017). Mercury treatments raised the proline content in <italic id="_italic-6">Melissa officinalis </italic>(Safari et al. 2019) and <italic id="_italic-7">Eichhornia crassipes </italic>(Malar et al. 2015), which is consistent with our findings. However, magnetic treatment with SMF has been found to decrease the proline content in soybean seedlings under mercury toxicity (Prajapati et al. 2023). Chickpea plants (Hozayn et al. 2022), S<italic id="_italic-8">alvia </italic>(Khosrojerdi et al. 2023) and orange seedlings (Mahmoud et al. 2019) treated with magnetic water also showed decreased amount of proline under saline soils. Okba et al. (2022) reported a decrease in proline content with magnetic water treatment, suggesting a positive role of magnetic water in reducing the detrimental effects of water deficit stress. These authors suggested that proline is especially important during stressful situations ­because it helps in regulation of the osmotic pressure of the cytosol and the vacuole with that of the external environment, which improves the uptake of water and nutrients. Plants have the capability to produce ROS in response to stress, which can have both positive and negative effects on their growth and survival (Hasanuzzaman et al. 2020). H<sub id="_subscript-72">2</sub>O<sub id="_subscript-73">2</sub> production was enhanced markedly by Cd toxicity in a number of plant species (Ahmad et al. 2011, Mahawar et al. 2021). However, Shine et al. (2012) have shown that priming with SMF can increase the content of ROS which can serve as key signalling agents, influencing critical events in seed life, including seed germination by inducing ABA catabolism and gibberellic acid (GA) biosynthesis. Magnetoprimed seeds showed a decrease in ABA concentration and a rise in GA content in soybean under salinity suggesting that MP ­actively contributes to seed germination and the release of dormancy (Kataria et al. 2022). Thus the production of ROS such as H<sub id="_subscript-74">2</sub>O<sub id="_subscript-75">2</sub> induced by MP of seeds represents one of the mechanisms through which seed invigoration and enhanced seedling growth can be achieved under nonstress as well as under abiotic stress conditions (Kataria et al. 2017, 2021, 2023, Raipuria et al. 2021). According to Barba‐Espin et al. (2010), during the germination of pea seeds, H<sub id="_subscript-76">2</sub>O<sub id="_subscript-77">2</sub> plays a ­direct role as a signalling molecule within the phytohormone network, causing the induction of proteins linked to plant signalling and development processes. Therefore, H<sub id="_subscript-78">2</sub>O<sub id="_subscript-79">2</sub> functions as a central node that harmonizes and integrates phytohormone interactions to improve magnetoprimed ­soybean seed germination and vigour under Cd toxicity. Therefore, MP with SMF could be a promising technique for improving germination of seeds and seedling growth by ­alleviating cadmium stress through improving the tolerance of soybean seedlings. But further investigation is required to completely comprehend the processes behind the advantageous effects of-MP in the presence of heavy metal toxicity.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="heading-532fffe60c71b8143c9e36344e63993a">
      <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p id="_paragraph-67">In conclusion, the present study revealed that the presence of Cd had a detrimental effect on seed germination and seedling growth, and this effect was found to be concentration dependent. Total amylase and protease activity declined under Cd toxicity, suggesting that it might be the result of disruptions in the reserve mobilisation process from cotyledons to the developing embryonic axis. The tolerance index of seedlings emerged from magnetoprimed seeds indicated that MP mitigates the toxic effects induced by Cd and enhances the tolerance in soybean seedlings by promoting root length, seedling vigour, total amylase and protease activity, H<sub id="_subscript-80">2</sub>O<sub id="_subscript-81">2</sub> and reducing MDA and proline content as compared to the seedlings from unprimed seeds under Cd toxicity. Overall, the study suggested the possibility that use of a magnetic field might mitigate the harmful effects of Cd toxicity in soybean. Further research in this area could explore the underlying mechanisms and optimize the magnetic field parameters for improved crop productivity and environmental sustainability.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="heading-801933bd3c649573bb0d3ce2f87e9dd0">
      <title>References</title>
      <p id="_paragraph-69">Abdul‐Baki, A. A., Anderson, J. D., 1973: Vigor determination in soybean seed by multiple criteria 1. Crop Science 13(6), ­630-633.</p>
      <p id="_paragraph-70">Abhary, M. K., Akhkha, A., 2023: Effects of neodymium ­magneto‐priming on seed germination and salinity tolerance in ­tomato. Bioelectromagnetics 44(1–2), 47–56. <ext-link id="external-link-5b9bb2c3568fe4ae37c2e8de984d0d63" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.22438">https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.22438</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-71">Ahmad, K., Bhatti, I. A., Muneer, M., Iqbal, M., Iqbal, Z., 2012: Removal of heavy metals (Zn, Cr, Pb, Cd, Cu and Fe) in ­aqueous media by calcium carbonate as an adsorbent. International Journal of Chemical and Biochemical Sciences 2, 48–53.</p>
      <p id="_paragraph-72">Ahmad, P., Nabi, G., Ashraf, M., 2011: Cadmium-induced oxidative damage in mustard [<italic id="_italic-9">Brassica juncea</italic> (L.) Czern. &amp; Coss.] plants can be alleviated by salicylic acid. South African ­Journal of Botany 77(1), 36–44. <ext-link id="external-link-f07ff24857ba337e57a5c1518e7ed0e4" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2010.05.003">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2010.05.003</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-73">Alengebawy, A., Abdelkhalek, S. T., Qureshi, S. R., Wang, M.-Q., 2021: Heavy metals and pesticides toxicity in agricultural soil and plants: Ecological Risks and Human Health Implications. Toxics 9(3), 42. <ext-link id="external-link-a5646da60d5c52457cd34d9adb78f6b5" xlink:href="https://doi.org/42. 10.3390/toxics9030042">https://doi.org/42. 10.3390/toxics9030042</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-74">Alia, P. P., Saradhi, N. D., P. Mohanty., 1991: Proline enhances primary photochemical activities in isolated thylakoid ­membranes of <italic id="_italic-10">Brassica juncea</italic> by arresting photoinhibitory damage. Biochemistry and Biophysics Research Communications 181(3), 1238–1244. <ext-link id="external-link-ed0dfc02493c29c84dcc4378828a6076" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-291X(91)92071-Q">https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-291X(91)92071-Q</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-75">Banerjee, A., Roychoudhury, A., 2015: WRKY proteins: signalling and regulation of expression during abiotic stress ­responses. The Scientific World Journal, 807560. <ext-link id="external-link-6b3656ef33788dd3b13ea56c3c12ce93" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/807560">https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/807560</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-76">Barba‐Espin, G., Diaz‐Vivancos, P., Clemente‐Moreno, M. J., ­Albacete, A., Faize, L., Faize, M., Pérez‐Alfocea, F., Hernández, J. A., 2010: Interaction between hydrogen peroxide and plant hormones during germination and the early growth of pea seedlings. Plant Cell and Environment 33(6), 981–994. <ext-link id="external-link-2c7dc7bcd57d38a28b1439ca3194da81" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02120.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02120.x</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-77">Bates, L. S., Waldren, R. A., Teare, I. D., 1973: Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil 39, 205-207.</p>
      <p id="_paragraph-78">Bautista, O. V., Fischer, G., Cárdenas, J. F., 2013: Cadmium and chromium effects on seed germination and root elongation in lettuce, spinach and Swiss chard. Agronomía Colombiana 31(1), 48–57.</p>
      <p id="_paragraph-79">Bewley, J. D., Black, M., 1994: Seeds: physiology of development and germination. Springer Science and Business Media.</p>
      <p id="_paragraph-80">Bilalis, D. J., Katsenios, N., Efthimiadou, A., Karkanis, A., ­Efthimiadis, P., 2012: Investigation of pulsed electromagnetic field as a novel organic pre-sowing method on germination and initial growth stages of cotton. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 31(2), 143–150. <ext-link id="external-link-f40930041193bc66dd17e4af7aa1237a" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3109/15368378.2011.624660">https://doi.org/10.3109/15368378.2011.624660</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-81">Carbonell, M. V., Martinez, E., Amaya, J. M., 2000: Stimulation of germination in rice (<italic id="_italic-11">Oryza sativa</italic> L.) by a static magnetic field. Electro- and Magnetobiology 19(1), 121–128. <ext-link id="external-link-e816abfd2fbf57f653d117117692636b" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1081/JBC-100100303">https://doi.org/10.1081/JBC-100100303</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-82">Chen, Y., Li, R., He, J.-M., 2011: Magnetic field can alleviate toxico­logical effect induced by cadmium in mungbean seedlings. Ecotoxicology 20, 760–769. <ext-link id="external-link-daa5b67e107266771d311abab6ac33bd" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-011-0620-6">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-011-0620-6</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-83">Chen, Y. P., Chen, D., Liu, Q., 2017: Exposure to a magnetic field or laser radiation ameliorates effects of Pb and Cd on physio­logy and growth of young wheat seedlings. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology 169, 171-177. <ext-link id="external-link-39a9d2a0e09fc377776134fd38008e10" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2017.03.012">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2017.03.012</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-84">Ci, D., Jiang, D., Wollenweber, B., Dai, T., Jing, Q., Cao, W., 2010: Cadmium stress in wheat seedlings: growth, cadmium accumulation and photosynthesis. Acta Physiologia Plantarum 32, 365–373. <ext-link id="external-link-e658940103478115baca01c57f52d3c9" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-009-0414-0">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-009-0414-0</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-85">Diehl, K. A., 2022: The effects of weak static magnetopriming on seed germination and plant growth. The Expedition 13.</p>
      <p id="_paragraph-86">El Rasafi, T., Nouri, M., Bouda, S., Haddioui, A., 2016: The effect of Cd, Zn and Fe on seed germination and early seedling growth of wheat and bean. Ekológia (Bratislava) 35(3), 213–223. <ext-link id="external-link-4a29366550bad337c719d1b0dfcc312a" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1515/eko-2016-0017">https://doi.org/10.1515/eko-2016-0017</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-87">Ercan, I., Tombuloglu, H., Alqahtani, N., Alotaibi, B., Bamhrez, M., Alshumrani, R., Ozcelik, S., Kayed, T.S., 2022: Magnetic field effects on the magnetic properties, germination, chlorophyll fluorescence, and nutrient content of barley (<italic id="_italic-12">Hordeum vulgare </italic>L.). Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 170, 36–48. <ext-link id="external-link-1744ad8ee51bbd8fc1bb218191e43ea0" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.11.033">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.11.033</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-88">Fatima, A., Kataria, S., Prajapati, R., Jain, M., Agrawal, A. K., Singh, B., Kashyap, Y., Tripathi, D. K., Singh, V. P., Gadre, R., 2020: Magnetopriming effects on arsenic stress‐induced morphological and physiological variations in soybean involving synchrotron imaging. Physiol Plantarum ppl.13211. <ext-link id="external-link-5314f4455522080774533df2c1087833" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13211">https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13211</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-89">Ferguson, B. J., Gresshoff, P. M., 2009: Soybean as a model legume. Grain Legumes 53(7).</p>
      <p id="_paragraph-90">Florez, M., Carbonell, M. V., Martínez, E., 2007: Exposure of maize seeds to stationary magnetic fields: Effects on germination and early growth. Environmental and Experimental Botany 59(1), 68–75. <ext-link id="external-link-e3614f7575f5a3001b6d3f282696bf75" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.10.006">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.10.006</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-91">Gharebaghi, A., Haghighi, M. A., Arouiee, H., 2017: Effect of cadmium on seed germination and earlier basil (<italic id="_italic-13">Ocimum basilicum</italic> L. and <italic id="_italic-14">Ocimum basilicum</italic> var. purpurescens) seedling growth. Trakia Journal of Sciences 15(1), 1–4. <ext-link id="external-link-b3f0c0215fd32e666de57b6f66f09f63" xlink:href="https://doi.org/ 10.15547/tjs.2017.01.001">https://doi.org/ 10.15547/tjs.2017.01.001</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-92">Gianazza, E., Wait, R., Sozzi, A., Regondi, S., Saco, D., Labra, M., Agradi, E., 2007: Growth and protein profile changes in <italic id="_italic-15">Lepidium sativum</italic> L. plantlets exposed to cadmium. Environmental and Experimental Botany 59(2), 179–187. <ext-link id="external-link-62ae33abafdb50163053053f9f189163" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.12.005">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.12.005</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-93">Hasanuzzaman, M., Bhuyan, M. B., Zulfiqar, F., Raza, A., Mohsin, S. M., Mahmud, J. A., Fujita, M., Fotopoulos, V., 2020: Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense in plants under abiotic stress: Revisiting the crucial role of a universal defense regulator. Antioxidants 9(8), 681. <ext-link id="external-link-0ca6da55f66ff2ee04fa20bbb84c3a9c" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9080681">https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9080681</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-94">He, J., Ren, Y., Chen, X., Chen, H., 2014: Protective roles of nitric oxide on seed germination and seedling growth of rice (<italic id="_italic-16">Oryza sativa</italic> L.) under cadmium stress. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 108, 114–119. <ext-link id="external-link-c48aaf27df0a09b553afc3533024c864" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.05.021">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.05.021</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-95">Heath, R. L., Packer, L., 1968: Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 125, 189–198.</p>
      <p id="_paragraph-96">Hozayn, M., AbdEl-Monem, A. A., El-Mahdy, A. A., 2022: Alleviation salinity stress in germination, seedling vigor, growth, physiochemical, yield and nutritional value of Chickpea (<italic id="_italic-17">Cicer arietinum</italic> L) using magnetic technology in sandy soil. Egyptian Journal of Chemistry 65(132), 1317–1331. <ext-link id="external-link-ac2698eefeecc3cd8e92756a605b9006" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.21608/ejchem.2022.160474.6910">https://doi.org/10.21608/ejchem.2022.160474.6910</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-97">Hussain, A., Rizwan, M., Ali, Q., Ali, S., 2019: Seed priming with silicon nanoparticles improved the biomass and yield while reduced the oxidative stress and cadmium concentration in wheat grains. Environmental Science<italic id="_italic-18"> </italic>and<italic id="_italic-19"> </italic>Pollution Research 26, 7579–7588. <ext-link id="external-link-f43d29c8abfce90f3cd8a0f17436c32f" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04210-5">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04210-5</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-98">Iqbal, M .Z., Rahmati, K., 1992: Tolerance of <italic id="_italic-20">Albizia lebbeck</italic> to Cu and Fe application. Ekológia, ČSFR 11, 427–430.</p>
      <p id="_paragraph-99">Kataria, S., Anand, A., Raipuria, R. K., Kumar, S., Jain, M., Watts, A., Brestic, M., 2022: Magnetopriming actuates nitric oxide synthesis to regulate phytohormones for improving germination of soybean seeds under salt stress. Cells 11(14), 2174. <ext-link id="external-link-320a96c4eaae97030cc582e73e6a1d8a" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11142174">https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11142174</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-100">Kataria, S., Baghel, L., Guruprasad, K. N., 2017: Pre-treatment of seeds with static magnetic field improves germination and early growth characteristics under salt stress in maize and soybean. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology 10, 83–90. <ext-link id="external-link-aa1edd1e8b63569537936d3c2a91f8fd" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2017.02.010">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2017.02.010</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-101">Kataria, S., Baghel, L., Jain, M., Guruprasad, K. N., 2019: Magnetopriming regulates antioxidant defense system in soybean against salt stress. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology 18, 101090. <ext-link id="external-link-98e71bf8fad4a088e22328a7fc23c348" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101090">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101090</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-102">Kataria, S., Jain, M., Rastogi, A., Brestic, M., 2021: Static magnetic field treatment enhanced photosynthetic performance in soybean under supplemental ultraviolet-B radiation. Photosynthesis Research 150, 263–278. <ext-link id="external-link-3c5b46d1380461c8780866b2bdb061d9" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-021-00850-2">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-021-00850-2</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-103">Kataria, S., Jain, M., Tripathi, D. K., Singh, V.P., 2020: Involvement of nitrate reductase‐dependent nitric oxide production in magnetopriming‐induced salt tolerance in soybean. Physiologia Plantarum 168(2), 422–436. <ext-link id="external-link-079aefba19b9a66d2e1af0ab0db17b9c" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13031">https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13031</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-104">Kataria, S., Lokesh, B., Guruprasad, K. N., 2015: Acceleration of germination and early growth characteristics of soybean and maize after pre-treatment of seeds with static magnetic field. International Journal of Tropical Agriculture 33(2), 985–992.</p>
      <p id="_paragraph-105">Kataria, S., Shukla, S., Jumrani, K., Jain, M., Gadre, R., 2023: Stimulating role of calcium and cyclic GMP in mediating the effect of magnetopriming for alleviation of salt stress in soybean seedlings. Seeds 2(2), 232–245. <ext-link id="external-link-6ff7067c299d29c4b976f63e48f89874" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/seeds2020018">https://doi.org/10.3390/seeds2020018</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-106">Kavi, P. S., 1977: The effect of magnetic treatment of soybean seeds and its moisture absorbing capacity. Science and Culture 9, 405–406.</p>
      <p id="_paragraph-107">Khizhenkov, P. K., Dobritsa, N. V., Netsvetov, M. V., Driban, V. M., 2001: Influence of low-and super low-frequency alternating magnetic fields on ionic permeability of cell membranes; Vliyanie nizko-i sverkhnizkochastotnykh peremennykh magnitnykh polej na ionnuyu pronitsaemost’kletochnykh membran. Dopovyidyi Natsyional’noyi Akademyiyi Nauk Ukrayini (4), 161-164.</p>
      <p id="_paragraph-108">Khosrojerdi, M., Moghaddam, M., Farhadi, N., 2023: Magnetic water irrigation changes physiological traits and stress tolerance of <italic id="_italic-21">Salvia virgata</italic> under saline conditions. Scientia Horticulturae 314, 111935. <ext-link id="external-link-e75372a7cc7c358d10a4c654bf0b82f4" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2023.111935">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2023.111935</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-109">Kunitz, M., 1947: A modified method for the determination of aminoacids. Journal of General Physiology 30, 291–298.</p>
      <p id="_paragraph-110">Kuriakose, S. V., Prasad, M. N. V., 2008: Cadmium stress affects seed germination and seedling growth in <italic id="_italic-22">Sorghum bicolor</italic> (L.) Moench by changing the activities of hydrolyzing enzymes. Plant Growth Regulation 54, 143–156. <ext-link id="external-link-68abd5e3667487c41b49b828e6872731" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-007-9237-4">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-007-9237-4</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-111">Liu, S., Yang, C., Xie, W., Xia, C., Fan, P., 2012: The effects of cadmium on germination and seedling growth of <italic id="_italic-23">Suaeda salsa.</italic> Procedia Environmental Sciences 16, 293–298. <ext-link id="external-link-eeda0314a00c6fb3a6086ffca9b20aa9" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2012.10.041">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2012.10.041</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-112">Mahawar, L., Popek, R., Shekhawat, G. S., Alyemeni, M. N., Ahmad, P., 2021: Exogenous hemin improves Cd<sup id="_superscript-43">2+</sup> tolerance and remediation potential in <italic id="_italic-24">Vigna radiata</italic> by intensifying the HO-1 mediated antioxidant defence system. Scientific Reports 11, 2811. <ext-link id="external-link-fd823efb031ffef89c9d64e59a9e4812" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82391-1">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82391-1</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-113">Mahawar, L., Shekhawat, G. S., 2023: Understanding the physiological mechanism of heme oxygenase for enhanced tolerance and phytoremediation of Cd<sup id="_superscript-44">2+</sup> in <italic id="_italic-25">Eruca sativa</italic>: Co-ordinated function of antioxidant defense system. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 42, 6307–6318. <ext-link id="external-link-071f745c2c49cc03a347f0a1beb85400" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-022-10825-9">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-022-10825-9</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-114">Mahmoud, T. A., Youssef, E. A., El-Harouny, S. B., Abo Eid, M. A. M., 2019: Effect of irrigation with magnetic water on nitrogen fertilization efficiency of navel orange trees. Plant Archives 19(1), 966–975.</p>
      <p id="_paragraph-115">Malar, S., Sahi, S. V., Favas, P. J. C., Venkatachalam, P., 2015: Mercury heavy-metal-induced physiochemical changes and genotoxic alterations in water hyacinths [<italic id="_italic-26">Eichhornia crassipes</italic> (Mart.)]. Environmental Science<italic id="_italic-27"> </italic>and<italic id="_italic-28"> </italic>Pollution Research 22, 4597–4608. <ext-link id="external-link-e931bf2a9bb54e9450ad7a43fbc67010" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3576-2">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3576-2</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-116">Martinez, E., Carbonell, M. V., Flórez, M., Amaya, J. M., Maqueda, R., 2009: Germination of tomato seeds [<italic id="_italic-29">Lycopersicon esculentum</italic> L.] under magnetic field. International Agrophysics 23, 45–49.</p>
      <p id="_paragraph-117">Mukherjee, S. P., Choudhuri, M. A., 1983: Implications of water stress‐induced changes in the levels of endogenous ascorbic acid and hydrogen peroxide in <italic id="_italic-30">Vigna</italic> seedlings. Physiologia Plantarum 58(2), 166–170. <ext-link id="external-link-ad6cd2a10839750fe6e4eede6e64d33d" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054. 1983.tb04162.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054. 1983.tb04162.x</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-118">Okba, S. K., Mazrou, Y., Mikhael, G. B., Farag, M. E., Alam-Eldein, S. M., 2022: Magnetized water and proline to boost the growth, productivity and fruit quality of ‘Taifi’pomegranate subjected to deficit irrigation in saline clay soils of semi-arid Egypt. Horticulturae 8(7), 564. <ext-link id="external-link-9f837ab034aab19b30201b27c3a5110b" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8070564">https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8070564</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-119">Prajapati, R., Kataria, S., Gadre, R., Landi, M., Jain, M., 2023: Unveiling the mechanisms underpinning alleviation of mercury toxicity by static magnetic field treatment in soybean. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. <ext-link id="external-link-4cb3e563e6feb9cd4313543c94b186d3" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-023-11063-3">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-023-11063-3</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-120">Prajapati, R., Kataria, S., Jain, M., 2020: Seed priming for alleviation of heavy metal toxicity in plants: An overview. Plant Science Today 7(3), 308–313. <ext-link id="external-link-9ccc24e57f87ad147a36813a660ba1fd" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2020.7.3.751">https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2020.7.3.751</ext-link> </p>
      <p id="_paragraph-121">Radhakrishnan, R., Kumari, B. D. R., 2012: Pulsed magnetic field: A contemporary approach offers to enhance plant growth and yield of soybean. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 51, 139–144. <ext-link id="external-link-b9d7f83b72bc3d9cbd10f1b6e4a24412" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2011.10.017">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2011.10.017</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-122">Raipuria, R. K., Kataria, S., Watts, A., Jain, M., 2021: Magneto-priming promotes nitric oxide via nitric oxide synthase to ameliorate the UV-B stress during germination of soybean seedlings. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology 220, 112211. <ext-link id="external-link-7e2f456e25c9044dc544d72f76f15e9d" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2021.112211">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2021.112211</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-123">Rajendra, P., Sujatha Nayak, H., Sashidhar, R. B., Subramanyam, C., Devendranath, D., Gunasekaran, B., Aradhya, R. S., Bhaskaran, A., 2005: Effects of power frequency electromagnetic fields on growth of Germinating <italic id="_italic-31">Vicia faba</italic> L., the broad bean. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 24(1), 39–54. <ext-link id="external-link-5fd9072adc140f3c3b929c5152b25ed6" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1081/JBC-200055058">https://doi.org/10.1081/JBC-200055058</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-124">Reina F. G., Pascual L. A., Fundora I. A., 2001: Influence of a stationary magnetic field on water relations in lettuce seeds. Part II: experimental results. Bioelectromagnetics 22(8), 596-602. 10.1002/bem.89. PMID: 11748678.</p>
      <p id="_paragraph-125">Safari, F., Akramian, M., Salehi-Arjmand, H., Khadivi, A., 2019: Physiological and molecular mechanisms underlying salicylic acid-mitigated mercury toxicity in lemon balm (<italic id="_italic-32">Melissa officinalis L</italic>.). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 183, 109542. <ext-link id="external-link-11e9dcb5186cd9289a78b6b6e4d13c60" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109542.">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109542.</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-126">Saharan, B. S., Brar, B., Duhan, J. S., Kumar, R., Marwaha, S., Rajput, V. D., Minkina, T., 2022: Molecular and physiological mechanisms to mitigate abiotic stress conditions in plants. Life 12(19), 1634. <ext-link id="external-link-183ae21083f683e53657f387268e1140" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/life12101634">https://doi.org/10.3390/life12101634</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-127">Sarraf, M., Kataria, S., Taimourya, H., Santos, L. O., Menegatti, R. D., Jain, M., Ihtisham, M., Liu, S., 2020: Magnetic field (MF) applications in plants: An overview. Plants 9, 1139.</p>
      <p id="_paragraph-128">Sawhney, S., Toky, K. L., Nanda, K. K., 1970: Changes in amylase activity during extension growth and floral induction in <italic id="_italic-33">Impatiens balsamina</italic>, a qualitative short day plant. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology 13, 198–205.</p>
      <p id="_paragraph-129">Sharmila, P., Kumari, P. K., Singh, K., Prasad, N. V. S. R. K., Pardha-Saradhi, P., 2017: Cadmium toxicity-induced proline accumulation is coupled to iron depletion. Protoplasma 254, 763–770. <ext-link id="external-link-2beaf9995101f114bbf158cf24e3491a" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-016-0988-5">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-016-0988-5</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-130">Sheirdil, R. A., Bashir, K., Hayat, R., Akhtar, M. S., 2012: Effect of cadmium on soybean (<italic id="_italic-34">Glycine max</italic> L) growth and nitrogen fixation. African Journal of Biotechnology 11(8), 1886–1891. <ext-link id="external-link-692107ece3064ff439c6d52417f81bb9" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB11.2849">https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB11.2849</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-131">Shine, M. B., Guruprasad, K. N., Anand, A., 2012: Effect of stationary magnetic field strengths of 150 and 200 mT on reactive oxygen species production in soybean. Bioelectromagnetics 33(5), 428–437. <ext-link id="external-link-8b66e9e05d6ef8bb41396c0925f31cb1" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.21702">https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.21702</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-132">Singhal, R. K., Kumar, M., Bose, B., Mondal, S., Srivastava, S., Dhankher, O. P., Tripathi, R. D., 2023: Heavy metal (loid)s phytotoxicity in crops and its mitigation through seed priming technology. International Journal of Phytoremediation 25(2), 187–206. <ext-link id="external-link-e431acaadff9d39a7852e9d630bad063" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2022.2068502">https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2022.2068502</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-133">Stefanello, R., 2019: Toxicity of cadmium on the germination of thyme seeds. Caderno de Pesquisa, Série Biologia 31(2), 9–21. <ext-link id="external-link-0fa6b1a337748bc6dcc63914999d15b7" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17058/cp.v31i2.13091">https://doi.org/10.17058/cp.v31i2.13091</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-134">Stutte, G. W., Monje, O., Hatfield, R. D., Paul, A.-L., Ferl, R. J., Simone, C. G., 2006: Microgravity effects on leaf morphology, cell structure, carbon metabolism and mRNA expression of dwarf wheat. Planta 224, 1038–1049. <ext-link id="external-link-d81426d03462d7d2d4fc1dc774409ed7" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-006-0290-4">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-006-0290-4</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-135">Thomas, S., Anand, A., Chinnusamy, V., Dahuja, A., Basu, S., 2013: Magnetopriming circumvents the effect of salinity stress on germination in chickpea seeds. Acta Physiologia Plantarum 35, 3401–3411. <ext-link id="external-link-52ccd114a01d75df273777bd9acfe0f7" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-013-1375-x">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-013-1375-x</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-136">Vashisth, A., Nagarajan, S., 2010: Effect on germination and early growth characteristics in sunflower (<italic id="_italic-35">Helianthus</italic><italic id="_italic-36"> annuus</italic>) seeds exposed to static magnetic field. Journal of Plant Physiology 167(2), 149–156. <ext-link id="external-link-2eb289f5b3be33909fd69f165632127a" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2009.08.011">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2009.08.011</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-137">Xue, Z., Gao, H., Zhao, S., 2014: Effects of cadmium on the photosynthetic activity in mature and young leaves of soybean plants. Environmental Science<italic id="_italic-37"> </italic>and<italic id="_italic-38"> </italic>Pollution Research 21, 4656–4664. <ext-link id="external-link-f4916eaca6e4914420855802cca4091b" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-2433-z">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-2433-z</ext-link></p>
      <p id="_paragraph-138">Yang, Y.-H., Gu, C.-S., Chen, F.-D., Shao, Y.-F., Wu, K.-W., Fang, W.-M., Liu, Z.-L., Ding, Y.-S., 2015: Physiological responses and bioaccumulation in <italic id="_italic-39">Nymphaea tetragona </italic>Georgi under cadmium exposure. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 24, 1716–1724.</p>
      <p id="_paragraph-139">Yin, X., Wei, R., Chen, H., Zhu, C., Liu, Y., Wen, H., Guo, Q. and Ma, J., 2021: Cadmium isotope constraints on heavy metal sources in a riverine system impacted by multiple anthropogenic activities. Science of the Total Environment 750, 141233. <ext-link id="external-link-280233348a263ae9927e2ada6e070408">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141233</ext-link></p>
    </sec>
  </body><back/></article>
